Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- general:common_myths [2012/03/14 23:28]
j.m [Software vs. format, format vs. codec]
+++ general:common_myths [2012/11/11 08:51] (current)
@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ===== Software vs. format, format vs. codec =====
-Contrary to popular myths, a codec is not the same thing as a format. A compression format is //a way// audio or video data are encoded, which is described in its specification (if it is standardized, it can be called a standard). An audio or video codec (a codec means en**co**der/**dec**oder) is a software or hardware //tool// that encodes or decodes audio or video data. Tools used for encoding are called encoders, tools used for decoding are called decoders. Software codecs, encoders and decoders are typically implemented as libraries.
+Contrary to popular myths, a codec is not the same thing as a format. A compression format is //a way// audio or video data are encoded, which is described in its specification (if it is standardized, it can be called a standard). An audio or video codec (a codec means **co**der/**dec**oder) is a software or hardware //tool// that encodes or decodes audio or video data. Tools used for encoding are called encoders, tools used for decoding are called decoders. Software codecs, encoders and decoders are typically implemented as libraries.
-==== Examples of compression formats (standards, specifiations) ====
+==== Examples of compression formats (standards, specifications) ====
   * MP3
@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 This all means that audio or video does not have to be decoded with the same codec it was encoded with. For example, when you encode an MP3 file with the LAME codec, it is not a "LAME file", "LAME format", "LAME audio" or just "LAME" – you don't encode "to LAME". It is an MP3 file and it can be decoded with other MP3 decoders, too.
-However, the common practice in digital video is using these two terms interchangeably, which is caused by years of industry obfuscations, greedy proprietarism (pretending that their codec is a format is a common business model for codec vendors and a significant source of their income, as it ties the customers to their products), intentional lying in various magazines, websites etc. (in order to make it "easy" for the readers who could be "confused" by correct terms), and the resulting ubiquitous ignorance and lack of knowledge. The nonsensical use of codec [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FourCC|FourCC]] in AVI files was a major factor in this massive confusion (video codecs have their own four-character identification in AVI files that is used by the player software for choosing a video decoder, so if the encoder uses a common standard format, users are supposed to install multiple decoders for the same format). Historically, when a company released their own proprietary codec, it was automatically supposed to be the only existing codec for that proprietary format.
+However, the common practice in digital video is using these two terms interchangeably, which is caused by years of industry obfuscations, greedy proprietarism (pretending that their codec is a format is a common business model for codec vendors and a significant source of their income, as it ties the customers to their products), intentional lying in various magazines, websites etc. (in order to make it "easy" for the readers who could be "confused" by correct terms), and the resulting ubiquitous ignorance and lack of knowledge. The nonsensical use of codec [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FourCC|FourCC]] in AVI files was a major factor in this massive confusion (video codecs have their own four-character identification in AVI files that is used by the player software for choosing a video decoder, so if the encoder uses a common standard format, users are supposed to install multiple decoders for the same format). Historically, when a company released their own proprietary codec, it was automatically supposed to be the only existing codec for that proprietary format. This practice has gone with the 20th century.
-But there are standards such as MPEG-1, MPEG-2 and MPEG-4. These are specifications. Developers can develop software or hardware implementations that encode or decode audio and video according to the specification. There can be multiple codecs, made by different people, using the same compression format such as MPEG-2 (used e.g. on DVDs) or MPEG-4 ASP. Video encoded with one of them can be decoded with another one, if they use the same compression format, which means they are compatible. So the essential thing for describing a video file is its format, not which codec was used for encoding.
+There are standards such as MPEG-1, MPEG-2 and MPEG-4. These are specifications. Developers can develop software or hardware implementations that encode or decode audio and video according to the specification. The purpose of standards is interoperability. There can be multiple codecs, made by different people, using the same compression format such as MPEG-2 (used e.g. on DVDs) or MPEG-4 ASP. Video encoded with one of them can be decoded with another one, if they use the same compression format, which means they are compatible. So the essential thing for describing a video file is its format, not which codec was used for encoding. There are only a handful of audio and video formats that are actually used in the 21st century. The vast majority of codecs made in this century only implement one of these common standards.
-==== DivX ====
+==== Frequent misnomers ====
+=== DivX ===
 DivX may arguably be the most widely misunderstood term in the digital video era. **Avidemux does not support DivX**. But it //does// support video that was encoded by the DivX software.
@@ Line 58: / Line 61: @@
 DivX is:
-  * A company (DivX, Inc.)
+  * A company, (DivX, Inc., now a subsidiary of Rovi Corporation)
   * A brand name of commercial software products made by DivX, Inc. (e.g. the DivX Plus Player or DivX Pro Codec).
   * An MPEG-4 ASP codec(nbsp)– the DivX Codec (in several variants such as the DivX Pro Codec) is a software product made by DivX, Inc.
@@ Line 78: / Line 81: @@
   * Video encoded with the DivX codec is MPEG-4 ASP video.
+  * When you make MPEG-4 ASP video with Avidemux (or other tools), it is not "DivX"  (i.e. you don't "encode to DivX" or "create DivX files"). It is MPEG-4 ASP video stored in an AVI container (default in Avidemux) or other containers (optional).
   * Avidemux can decode video encoded with DivX and other MPEG-4 ASP codecs, it just does not use DivX for that. Avidemux uses built-in libavcodec from FFmpeg for MPEG-4 ASP decoding.
-  * MPEG-4 ASP video encoded with Avidemux can be decoded with DivX or various other MPEG-4 ASP decoders such as Xvid, 3ivx or ffdshow. It is not "DivX video" (i.e. you don't "encode to DivX" or "create DivX"), it is MPEG-4 ASP video stored in the AVI container (default in Avidemux) or other containers (optional).
+  * MPEG-4 ASP video encoded with Avidemux can be decoded with DivX or various other MPEG-4 ASP decoders such as Xvid, 3ivx or ffdshow.
-==== Xvid ====
+=== Xvid ===
 Xvid is an open-source MPEG-4 ASP video codec. Avidemux can optionally use external Xvid library for encoding if it was compiled with Xvid support.
@@ Line 100: / Line 104: @@
   * The only open-source MPEG-4 codec. Contrary to popular belief, other free MPEG-4 codecs exist, too, in particular FFmpeg MPEG-4, which is also used by default in MPlayer, xine, VLC, ffdshow and other projects.
-==== x264 ====
+=== x264 ===
 x264 is a free MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 encoder (for the H.264-MPEG-4 AVC relation, see the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264/MPEG-4_AVC|Wikipedia H.264/MPEG-4 AVC article]]). Avidemux can use x264 for H.264 encoding.

Avidemux

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools